A week ago, while thousands of people tried to get close to the doors of the Teatre Grec, Olivia Rodrigo was singing in Barcelona before barely 2,000 guests at a concert organized by Spotify. Outside, hundreds of fans were left without tickets. Inside, Rodrigo celebrated that nine of her songs have surpassed one billion streams and also debuted a new aesthetic stage coinciding with the release of You Seem Pretty Sad for a Girl So In Love. Hours later, the internet had decided that the important thing was neither the concert nor her music. It was her look.
Read more Algeciras, where the Mediterranean corridor does not begin
A floral dress in pink tones, with a short flare, ruffled bloomers, and high boots. A silhouette that referred more to Courtney Love in 1994 than to any contemporary childhood fantasy. Even so, throughout the weekend and the following days, comments accusing her of “infantilizing herself,” “sexualizing girls’ clothing,” or “normalizing problematic images” multiplied. The speed with which a dress ended up becoming a moral debate was almost fascinating. Especially because the conversation seemed to be produced by people completely incapable of recognizing a cultural reference prior to TikTok.
Some accused Rodrigo of “normalizing” problematic images; others insisted that an adult woman should not wear garments associated with childhood. The intensity of the reaction was disproportionate even for the internet, that place where any visual element risks becoming a civilizational symptom.
The babydoll never really belonged to the children’s wardrobe. The silhouette appeared during World War II, when textile restrictions forced women’s nightgowns to be shortened and simplified. The term was fixed in the collective imagination after Baby Doll (1956), the Elia Kazan film starring Carroll Baker, where that apparent domestic innocence functioned as a mechanism of sexual tension and power. Decades later, Courtney Love, Kat Bjelland, or the riot grrrl figures took up those dresses precisely because of their cultural ambiguity: garments associated with delicacy used on stages full of noise, rage, and female confrontation. The contradiction was the message.
Rodrigo clearly belongs to that aesthetic genealogy. She has been building an image for years where adolescent vulnerability, pop irony, and references to the alternative female imagery of the nineties and 2000s coexist. The interesting thing is not that she wears a babydoll. The interesting thing is that the internet continues to react as if a woman playing with codes of femininity were necessarily suspicious.
A woman’s clothing continues to be treated as a moral manifesto that must be interpreted, corrected, or collectively approved. And perhaps here lies the real underlying issue: the contemporary inability to tolerate aesthetic ambiguity. Everything needs an immediate and stable reading. If a dress incorporates codes associated with innocence, then it must be problematic. If an artist uses references of exaggerated femininity, someone will immediately demand a political justification.
Fashion can no longer be contradictory, uncomfortable, or simply referential. It must send correct messages. This case is particularly revealing because Olivia Rodrigo has not built her career for the male gaze. Her creative universe obsessively speaks of female experiences: friendship, heartbreak, romantic humiliation, adolescent rage. Even this new visual stage, softer and more ethereal, seems directed toward an aesthetic tradition historically developed by women for other women.
Read more A toolbox reveals the identity of a Pompeii victim
The text linked a recent appearance by Swift in New York (a short black Valentino dress signed by Alessandro Michele) with the look Rodrigo had worn days earlier in Barcelona. Swift represented the glamorous version of the supposed return of the babydoll; Rodrigo, the punkier and nineties reading. The problem is that Taylor Swift’s dress was not even technically a babydoll.
That detail, irrelevant to anyone outside the internet, ended up becoming the core of a small digital conspiracy theory. Part of Swift’s fandom began accusing Rodrigo’s team of having pushed favorable articles in Vogue, Rolling Stone, Cosmopolitan, or Harper’s Bazaar to “clean up” the controversy that arose after the weekend. The tweets spoke of public relations operations, coordinated campaigns, and bought media. All based on an article probably built on two much simpler things: Taylor Swift generates clicks and babydoll has been one of the most talked-about words on the internet during the week.
The situation is somewhat comical. A group of people trying to prove a media conspiracy around a dress category misused by a fashion magazine that was simply doing what many digital media do today: detect a viral conversation and milk it to exhaustion.
Fans do not help much. The media, including some that present themselves as spaces of feminist sensitivity, neither. A dress ends up becoming a moral scandal for days because the digital economy needs constant outrage and because contemporary culture has almost completely lost the ability to look at fashion as fashion.
Olivia Rodrigo went on stage at the Grec dressed like a mix between Courtney Love and a melancholic heroine of Sofia Coppola. The internet reacted as if it had witnessed a moral threat. The disproportion explains quite well the state of things.
Read more Who will win Eurovision? Finland and Australia, favorites in the bets, with Israel in fourth place
