The judge postpones setting the date for the trial of González Amador due to “work overload”

The judge postpones setting the date for the trial of González Amador due to "work overload"

The judge in Madrid who will try Alberto González Amador, partner of the Madrid president Isabel Díaz Ayuso, for tax fraud has announced that given the “overload and circumstances weighing on the Court” the date for the trial is still pending, once the opening of the oral trial was already agreed for September 2025.

Read more Lola, a relative of a hospitalized patient, manages to have the World Cup final shown for free in Madrid hospitals

In an order, the magistrate explains that a date will be set for the businessman to sit on the defendant’s bench “when scheduling reasons allow it.”

On the other hand, she has accepted the evidence requested by the Prosecutor’s Office, State Attorney – representing the Tax Agency – and other parties, except for some specific statements or documents given the “manifest uselessness.”

González Amador is only pending a date to be tried for the alleged commission of two tax crimes, another of documentary falsification, as well as a continuous accounting crime and another of belonging to a criminal organization.

Read more Renfe will allow travel with dogs up to 40 kilos on all its trains from July 21: price, requirements, and exclusions

The instructor, holder of the Court of Instruction number 19 of Madrid, only prosecuted him for two tax crimes, for the fraud of 350,000 euros and for documentary falsification. However, in the opening order the magistrate included all the crimes for which he is accused by all parties in this case, the popular accusations.

Along with González Amador, four alleged front men are also accused, Maximiliano Niederer, as well as David Herrera and Agustín and José Manuel Carrillo, who through their companies would have issued invoices for fictitious work.

According to the investigation, González Amador would have used them to reduce his earnings by claiming before the Tax Agency that he had practically no margin between income and expenses and therefore reduce the corporate tax to the maximum. It was following an investigation by the Tax Agency that the fraud was detected. Since the defrauded amount was more than 120,000 euros annually, it became a crime and therefore the inspection process was halted to start a criminal process with the complaint from the Prosecutor’s Office and State Attorney.

Read more From Lamine Yamal to Zendaya: when the gods have fun with celebrities

Translated from

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *